Spin, Threat, Lie, Threat, Spin. That About Covers It.

Amputee soldiers return to active duty

By MICHELLE ROBERTS
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

View related video

SAN ANTONIO -- In the blur of smoke and blood after a bomb blew up under his Humvee in Iraq, Sgt. Tawan Williamson looked down at his shredded leg and knew it couldn't be saved. His military career, though, pulled through. Less than a year after the attack, Williamson is running again with a high-tech prosthetic leg and plans to take up a new assignment, probably by the fall, as an Army job counselor and affirmative action officer in Okinawa, Japan.

In an about-face by the Pentagon, the military is putting many more amputees back on active duty - even back into combat, in some cases.

Entire Article: Click Here

What the %$#@! This is disturbing.

US Member of Al-Qaeda Threatens Attack

This video cracks me up. It looks like a bad SNL skit.

Mossad Agent Pearlman Releases Phony "Al-Qaeda Tape".

While President Bush authorizes the CIA to bankroll and arm the real Al-Qaeda in Iran

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Adam Pearlman, the Jewish Mossad agent who once wrote stinging essays condemning Muslims as "bloodthirsty terrorists", has once again popped up as an "Al-Qaeda spokesman" to frighten the dwindling number of Americans who still believe Al-Qaeda exists outside of U.S. intelligence circles.

"An American member of al-Qaida warned President Bush on Tuesday to end U.S. involvement in all Muslim lands or face an attack worse than the Sept. 11 suicide assault, according to a new videotape."
"Wearing a white robe and a turban, Adam Yehiye Gadahn, who also goes by the name Azzam al-Amriki, said al-Qaida would not negotiate on its demands," reports the Associated Press.

Who is the mysterious Adam Yehiye Gadahn?

The FBI lists Gadahn's aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.

Adam Pearlman is his real name and his grandfather is none other than the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993. Mike Rivero has the scoop at WhatReallyHappened.com.

Israel's Mossad intelligence agency was caught in 2002 creating a phony Al-Qaeda group to justify attacks on Palestinians.

Pearlman has a knack of releasing his tapes at the most politically opportune time for Bush, having first burst onto the scene shortly before the 2004 presidential election and then again right after Katrina when the President's approval rating was tanking fast.

Even more mainstream publications, like the Los Angeles City Beat, have dismissed Pearlman before as nothing more than "cartoonish propaganda."

Pearlman had a hippy upbringing, a brief but intense flirtation with death metal and before a sudden transformation, once referred to Muslims as “bloodthirsty, barbaric terrorists.” Pearlman was a hardcore Jewish Zionist and wrote essays and screeds bashing the Muslim faith. He even got into fights at mosques and beat up Muslim worshippers.

Pearlman's personal history and the highly suspicious nature in which he suddenly professed his conversion to Islam in a single Internet posting and later appeared on the scene as a spokesman for "Al-Qaeda" are all the ingredients needed to draw the conclusion that Pearlman is working as a double agent and most likely for Mossad.

The Pearlman tape was once again obtained by the IntelCenter group, a U.S. government contractor, and it's head Ben Venzke has given the tape credence in media interviews concerning the story.

In our previous groundbreaking expose, we unveiled the ties between Intelcenter, a group that regularly 'obtains' Al-Qaeda tapes and the Pentagon. Intelcenter is an offshoot of IDEFENSE, which was staffed by a senior military psy-op intelligence officer Jim Melnick, who has worked directly for Donald Rumsfeld.

Intelcenter were behind the October 2006 release of the "laughing hijackers" tape that showed Mohammad Atta and Ziad Jarrah allegedly attending a 2000 Al-Qaeda meeting and reading their last will and testament.

Segments of the video that were interspersed with footage of the "laughing hijackers," Jarrah and Atta, showing Bin Laden giving a speech to an audience in Afghanistan on January 8 2000, were culled from what terror experts described as surveillance footage taken by a "security agency."

News reports at the time contained the admission that the U.S. government had been in possession of the footage since 2002, while others said it was found when the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and yet it was still bizarrely reported that the tape, bearing all the hallmarks of having been filmed and edited by undercover US intelligence and having admittedly been in US possession for five years, was released over the weekend of September 31/October 1 by Al-Qaeda.

The video also contained segments that were first broadcast in a British documentary called The Road to Guantanamo, which was originally aired in March 2006. The context of the corresponding scene in the dramatized documentary featured U.S. interrogators attempting to coerce Gitmo detainees into confessing Al-Qaeda membership by showing them fake videos where their likeness had been computer generated to appear as if they were in attendance during Bin Laden's January 8 2000 speech.

The monster in the closet is once again being waved in front of the American people's faces in order to quell bubbling national resentment about the ongoing carnage in Iraq and the fact that May was the deadliest month in terms of our boys returning home in flag-draped caskets.

Meanwhile, President Bush has authorized the CIA to bankroll and arm Jundullah, a Sunni Al-Qaeda organization, to attack Iran in order to destabilize Ahmadinejad's government.

While Bush grandstands in his Rose Garden speech about how Al-Qaeda wants to kill our children and as Mossad agent Pearlman rants on a video tape about a new 9/11, the only real Al-Qaeda are being equipped, funded and trained by our own government to kill innocent civilians in the Middle East in order to pave the way for the next chapter of Neo-Con blood-letting - while crude propaganda tapes are foisted on us at home in an effort to hoodwink us into supporting it all.

Pirates and Emperors - Schoolhouse Rock

Activists Go Face To Face With Evil As Rockefeller Confronted

We Are Change group ask arch-elitist why he admits to working to destroy America in his own book.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 29, 2007

As part of a blitz of recent activism in which Al Gore, Rudy Giuliani and the CFR were all confronted, Infowars reporter Luke Rudkowski and the rest of the We Are Change crew went face to face with evil when they paid a visit to arch-elitist David Rockefeller at his own home in New York.



The group scouted out Rockefeller's address and waited for him to exit, watched closely by security guards, before informing him of the fact that a citizen's grand jury was seeking his indictment for his involvement in 9/11.

Rockefeller, stooped and shuffling like some evil hunchback cartoon character, did his best to ignore the group and enter a waiting car while his security pushed away the activists.

Rudkowski made it clear to Rockefeller that "We know about your New World Order, we won't be silenced about it - national sovereignty will prevail - you guys will never have a New World Order."

The group were then threatened by security and told to "Take your story some place else."

Rockefeller, his bodyguards and aides were also confronted with the elitist's own words as written in his 2002 book Memoirs, in which Rockefeller admits to being part of a globalist cabal that is working against American interests towards a one world government.

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it," Rockefeller writes on page 405.

The WeAreChange.org group have been on a blitz of activism in recent weeks, confronting Al Gore, Rudy Giuliani, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Council on Foreign Relations as well as Larry Silverstein, during which one of Silverstein's security thugs called in a hoax bomb threat to try and get the group arrested and was later fired.

Giuliani Confronted By 9/11 Truthers, Lies About WTC Collapse

Former New York Mayor flip-flops for third time on foreknowledge of tower's implosion.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 29, 2007

9/11 truthers are making headlines again today after confronting Rudy Giuliani in New York on his foreknowledge of the collapse of the twin towers. Amazingly, just weeks after saying the opposite, Giuliani now claims he had no idea the towers were going to fall.



"A radical group at a Bronx fundraiser confronted Rudolph Giuliani on Tuesday morning, accusing him of being one of the "criminals of 9/11," reports WNBC.

"The Republican nominee for president was outside City Island's Sea Shore restaurant in the Bronx, speaking with WNBC.com's Adam Shapiro about his fundraising in New York."

"Afterward, a young woman claiming to be the relative of a Sept. 11, 2001, firefighter who died when the towers collapsed, asked Giuliani why he allegedly told Peter Jennings the towers would not fall that day, but did not stop the rescue efforts of firefighters and police officers."

"The woman claims Giuliani knew the towers would fall, and allowed rescuers to go to their deaths. She asked him, "How do you sleep at night?"

"Giuliani was extremely polite, telling the young woman she was wrong and that he never said what she claimed. At that point, another protester from her group, a young man, interrupted Giuliani with the same allegations."

"Giuliani replied by saying, "I didn't realize the towers would collapse." He later added, "No one that I know of had any idea they would implode. That was a complete surprise."

Giuliani was confronted by Infowars reporters led by 9/11 truth movement warrior Luke Rudowski and the story has since garnered national attention, appearing on the Drudge Report early this afternoon.

In claiming that he had no idea that the towers would collapse, Giuliani has now flip-flopped on this issue for a third time.

"We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse," Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings during a phone interview on 9/11. Giuliani has never identified the source of this warning, unprecedented as it is that modern steel framed buildings would collapse from fire damage for the first time in history, and it completely contradicts his assertion today that he "didn't realize the towers would collapse."

Buckle Up People. This Isn't Good.

Bush makes power grab



That job, as the document describes, is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.

The directive loosely defines "catastrophic emergency" as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

Entire Article: Click Here

Similar Article Below: Scroll down or Click Here

Nine U.S. warships in Gulf for show of force



ABOARD USS JOHN C. STENNIS (Reuters) - The largest daytime assembly of U.S. warships in the Gulf since the 2003 Iraq war prepared on Wednesday to hold drills off Iran's coast in a major U.S. show of force that unnerved oil markets.

Entire Article: Click Here

When these things happen, I think that people need to be aware and look at the big picture here. Ask yourself why.

Why would the military and government send all that muscle over there? That is a lot of resources being spent for just a bluff.

Why would this directive be put through all of the sudden? Why the sudden need for power if there is a disaster? The motives need to be questioned.

In my opinion, they are gearing up for something big. When and if something happens, try to think with a clear mind and don't let emotions blur your judgement and pay close attention to how things are presented in the media.

This really is disturbing as far as I'm concerned.

Zing!

Ooh, somebody got the cold shoulder.

This Is The Final Straw!

I know this is early but I see this as ground breaking news. Bush does not buckle up! What the hell?! Impeach!!!!!!

WASHINGTON - President Bush encourages people to wear seat belts. Whether he routinely does so himself is not as clear. The question arose Tuesday, Bush's first full day back in town after a weekend at his ranch in Texas _ where he was spotted driving a pickup truck without wearing a seat belt.

http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2007/05/22/670254.html&cvqh=itn_seatbelt

Edit: I posted this on another site and people thought I was serious. My reaction above is supposed to be a joke.

New Presidential Directive Gives Bush Dictatorial Power

National Security & Homeland Security Presidential Directive establishes "National Continuity Policy"



Larry Chin
Global Research
May 21, 2007

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007 declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event”, George W. Bush can become what is best described as "a dictator":

"The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government."

This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic “security”.

The full text is below. A critical analysis on the directive can be found here.

This is another step towards official martial law (see “US government fans homeland security fears”), which suggests that a new "catastrophic event" 9/11-type pretext could be in the pipeline.

Entire Article: Click Here

Marines For 9/11 Truth

http://www.truthaction.org/USMC.html

Always good to see soldiers speaking out.

Professor Steven Jones: Fresh Evidence Proves Controlled Demolition

Professor Steven Jones' groundbreaking presentation at the Rebuilding America's Senses event at the University of Texas. During the talk, Jones unveils compelling new evidence that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that artificial explosives were used to implode the twin towers on 9/11.

Jones laid out facts about steel samples recovered from the WTC site that Popular Mechanics dare not even attempt to debate. Debunkers are scared to even get near this information because the science behind it fundamentally contradicts the official story of what happened on 9/11. The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on.

Members of Prison Planet.tv. can watch this video right now by clicking here to login.

Debunkaholic Michelle Malkin Was A 9/11 Truther

Neo-Con Fox News poster child who called truth movement a virus grilled official story in 2002 column.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Echoing the sheer hypocrisy of fellow debunkaholic George Monbiot, Michelle put every Muslim in a concentration camp Malkin, who routinely attacks the 9/11 truth movement, was herself a truther, and wrote a column just 6 months after the attack in which she harshly questioned the official story.

Echoing the sheer hypocrisy of fellow debunkaholic George Monbiot, Michelle 'put every Muslim in a concentration camp' Malkin, who routinely attacks the 9/11 truth movement, was herself a truther, and wrote a column just six months after the attack in which she harshly questioned the official story.

Last week, Malkin appeared on Fox News' Big Story with John Gibson to smear the 9/11 truth movement as a "virus" and called for Ron Paul to be kicked out of the debates for associating with "9/11 conspiracy nut Alex Jones."

Deliciously ironic therefore it is to have uncovered one of her columns from 2002, by way of the website michellemalkinisanidiot.com, in which she grills the official story, sounding far more like a "truther" than her incarnation today as a Neo-Con pin-up girl spouting phony indignation at Alex Jones and other 9/11 truth movement leaders.

Malkin attacks Paul on 9/11 questions

MSNBC Impeachment Poll

To Vote Click Here

David Ray Griffin in Seattle

Let me say one thing first off, Griffin is the man. Last nights event was great. If you get a chance to ever see him speak live, do it.

He mostly went over the subjects in his new book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking. He spoke about Popular Mechanics and other supporters of the official conspiracy theory and basically blew all of them out of the water.

As far as I'm concerned, if any OCT supporter was able to walk out of there without their paradigm totally altered, they are hopelessly programmed and are a lost cause.

Afterwards, he had a question and answer segment. One that I found most interesting was a question to him that asked if he had ever had a positive experience when being interviewed by mainstream media. (We all know how the 9/11 truth movement is treated in the media.) His answer, "nothing that I can talk about".

Look for good things to come.

Sofia Smallstorm and 9/11 Mysteries

I met Sofia last night at David Ray Griffin's event in Seattle. I spoke with her about 9/11 Mysteries (there is a new version of it now)and her upcoming Part 2 film of the series.

I came to learn that she is getting killed financially by the amounts of people burning DVD's of the film and not enough people buying the film.

She spent over $100,000 dollars of her own money and made huge sacrifices to make 9/11 Mysteries possible. Without the support of people purchasing the film, Part 2 is just not going to happen.

If you don't have it, please buy a copy or two. If you already have it, buy some anyway.

I know burning and sharing films is important to the spreading of information, but we need to support these people the best we can.

Thanks.

You can purchase 9/11 Mysteries among other goodies here: http://www.911weknow.com

Colbert Knows Why Pro-Torture Responses Got Loud Applause at GOP Debate

9/11 Survivor Questions Official Story on Local Fox News

Willy speaks the truth seamlessly.

Ron Paul on CNN

Ron Paul refuses to retract his comments on the root causes of terrorism and "Blowback" during this week's Fox News GOP candidates debate and demands Rudy Guiliani apologize to him, pointing out that Paul trounced Guiliani in Fox's own poll.

Loose Change Creators on The View May 24th

According to a release from ABC, Korey Rowe and Dylan Avery, creators of the 9/11 conspiracy documentary Loose Change will appear on the May 24th show.

Also listed is William Rodriguez, who was a janitor at the North Tower of the World Trade Center, who has since become part of the 9/11 truth movement.

No word yet on if Jason Bermas is going to be there. He should be though.

Cancelled for now. Maybe a re-schedule.

John Gibson and Michelle Malkin Smear Ron Paul

What the #$%! is wrong with these people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Click Here To See Some Major League Idiots

Rudy Giuliani's Earnings Made Public

By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer

Excerpts from article.

WASHINGTON _ Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani reported a whopping $16.1 million in earned income over the past 16 months, most of it in speaking fees, according to financial documents filed Wednesday.

Giuliani's report is the first detailed glimpse of his vast holding and income since his term as mayor of New York ended. Since then, Giuliani parlayed his image as an in-charge mayor during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks into lucrative speaking fees and business enterprises.

He reported $13 million to $45 million in assets, including his share in Giuliani & Co., a partnership that provides an array of consulting services. He also listed income from dividends and interest on many of those investments of at least $411,332 and as much as $3.3 million.

Giuliani's biggest single source of income between January 2006 and February 2007 came from speaking engagements around the world. He grossed $11.4 million in speeches, which includes fees retained by the Washington Speakers Bureau. He typically charged $100,000 per speaking engagement and as much as $200,000 on occasion.

Does anyone see a problem here (rhetorical question)? Add it to the list of government officials making serious bucks off of 9/11. We'll see how much money you make when your envolvement in 9/11 get's exposed.

Giuliani wants a tamper proof ID card.

Last night on a live post debate Hannity & Combs, Giuliani mentioned that we need a tamper proof ID card.

GIULIANI: "This whole thing is a tremendous danger for us (illegal immigrants), abroad and here. It isn't just limited to illegal immigrants. But the reality is if we had the measures that I talk about, a tamper-proof I.D. card. A database in which everybody was entered so we knew who these people were."

"Let everybody come forward and get that card. If they don't come forward, then let's throw them out."

Now, if it's not limited to people that are illegal, than what else could he mean. Legal immigrants, legal citizens, everyone?

The first thing that comes straight to my mind when I hear him say "tamper-proof", is microchip implants.

First they will start with immigrants, then make their way to the rest of us.


To watch the interview, Click Here
and fast forward to the 1:50 mark.

Ron Paul

A lot of people do not know who Ron Paul is. To sum it up, he is running for the 2008 Presidency and is running under the Republican name yet he is a Libertarian. It makes total sense to why he is doing this. It gives him the best chances to win.

If you are visiting this website, you probably have a better understanding of how the world really works. Well I'm telling you, Ron Paul is one of us. He knows about all the corrupt and immoral things that the government does. He is our best chance for getting things changed. He is the only person that I have EVER wanted to vote for.

Here are some articles and videos about Ron Paul. Read, watch, and go search out more info on him.


Ron Paul Upsets Controlled-Media Debate as Clear Winner

Pundits & Candidates Seek to Exile Statesman from Republican Party-- In Spite of Leading Poll Numbers-- Over His Anti-Torture, Anti-War and Anti-Tax Standpoint


Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
Jones Report
May 15, 2007

Congressman Ron Paul shook the establishment in last night's second round of 2008 Republican debates for the Presidency. Not only did his anti-war, anti-torture and pro-liberty platform stand glaring in the face of those political whores dubbed as "top-tier" but he managed to catch the ire of 9/11 criminal Rudy Giuliani for daring to suggest aggressive foreign policy would stir up blowback.

What's worse, Ron Paul interrupted the worship of establishment-selected candidates by winning the debate's own poll and forcing FOX to cover the mere "second-tier" candidate-- a distinction mainstream media have been using to marginalize those outside of direct control.


Ron Paul's performance in his second debate victory-- as moderators repeatedly suggest he doesn't belong in the Republican party.

Ron Paul garnered approximately 20 minutes of air-time on Fox alone last night-- including about 10 minutes of debate questions and another 10 minutes composed of attacks and dismissals by pundits, other candidates and an interview with Hannity & Colmes.

Sean Hannity stated his "surprise" that Ron Paul was leading with 30% of the FOX News text-message poll vote, despite that fact that he also won the Republican debates on MSNBC-- a fact which the media under-reported and even censored.

At the time of press, Ron Paul also had a distinct lead-- by a huge margin-- in the MSNBC poll regarding the South Carolina Republican debate.



Alan Colmes probed to understand how Ron Paul could emerge the decisive leader in an otherwise revolting adherence to policies advocating war expansion and unrestrained use of "extreme interrogation tactics" which skirt the damning name of "torture."

Fellow "second-tier" candidate Duncan Hunter attributed Ron Paul's dominance in the FOX text-message poll to his "entertainment value," insinuating that his policies and views (including the controversy generated over 9/11 comments) could not be taken seriously.

GOPAC chairman Michael Steele went so far as to suggest that Ron Paul should not belong to the Republican party, stating that he was "done" with Paul and did not care what the results of the FOX poll were.

Debate moderators pointed out Congressman Paul's distinction as the only Republican candidate who voted against military action in Iraq as they repeatedly demanded that he answer to being in the 'wrong party' or 'not fitting in with the Republican party.' Ron Paul answered smartly-- pointing out that he wanted to lead the country, not the party, and that 65-70% of the country was against the Iraq war and long for an end to the mired conflict.

Regardless, he was attacked for his adherence to non-interventionist philosophy and defamed as some kind of 9/11 heretic-- as various pundits pretended he had faltered in the debates and claimed that anonymous South Carolina Republicans had reached consensus on the idea that Ron Paul "did not acquit himself" and must be discarded.


Ron Paul is defamed by pundits and candidates alike who make
excuses for his poll victory.

One pundit even goes so far to suggest that Ron Paul's success in the poll was due primarily to attention won after Giuliani attacked him on 9/11 statements, as well as organizational prowess amongst text-messaging voters.

Sean Hannity refused to believe Ron Paul won the debate, claiming he didn't have the opportunity to text in his vote.

Yet, as Ron Paul continued to win the debate poll, the live-results format pigeonholed FOX News into ongoing coverage of the winner-- as his only competition in poll results came from Mitt Romney, who briefly led the poll with 27% when Ron Paul had only 26%.

It is continually suggested that "second-tier" candidates such drop from the race and make way for the "first-tier" candidates to shine, though the only vote process at this stage-- polls-- all indicate Ron Paul as a likely winner and certainly a top contender.


During a post-debate interview with Hannity & Colmes, Ron Paul
discusses his differences in foreign policy and much more. Giuliani
elaborates on his reaction to Ron Paul's unsettling statements.

Fox News Rigs Entire Debate To Savagely Attack Ron Paul

Texas Congressman targeted by Giuliani, Hannity & Colmes as pre-screened audience applause torture and warmongering, Fox limits post-election polls to three hours and no Internet voting yet Paul still successful

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, May 16, 2007

In a sickening display of cronyism and as a consequence of the sheer terror elicited amongst the establishment after his previous success, Fox News rigged last night's entire presidential debate in a crass effort to smear Ron Paul - yet the Texas Congressman still beat Rudy Giuliani in Fox's own poll.

If you thought the MSNBC debate was somewhat unfair towards Ron Paul, then this was an absolute debacle.

The audience for the debate was clearly pre-screened and pre-selected to include only mainly geriatric 75 year old plus Fox News viewers who are scared of their own shadow. How else can the bizarre applause for warmongering and torture, which polls show are both clearly opposed by the majority of American people, be explained?

Guantanamo Bay is uniformly abhorred, even to the point where George W. Bush himself said he wanted to close it down, and yet Romney is clapped for saying he would like to double it!



Are these audience members robots or did Fox News dub the audio to include the applause?

Giuliani clearly endorses torture and the mindless drones in attendance rapaciously lap it up! Fox News manufactured a fictitious scenario to rig the debate - the notion that terrorists are about to detonate a nuclear bomb and that only torture can lead to its discovery.

Host Bit Hume failed to mention the fact that obtaining confessions from torture is notoriously unreliable because the victim simply tells the interrogator what he wants to hear, and not necessarily the truth. In fact, using torture in place of more traditional investigative techniques would only create false leads, waste more time and put the country in more danger.

Under the Constitution of the United States, which any of these potential Presidents will have to swear an oath to uphold, evidence obtained from torture is not admissible in court. In effect, Giuliani, Romney and Tancredo (who has now completely discredited himself) have promised to violate the Constitution before they even get into office.

Despite the fact that Paul was given the more difficult questions and less time to answer them and was then savagely attacked after he debate, he still came out on top when the early polling began, eventually finishing a close second to Romney and easily ahead of Giuliani.

Fox News were obviously desperate to prevent Ron Paul winning the poll because they restricted it to text message only, no Internet voting, and closed it down declaring Romney the winner after just three hours.



Fox News anchor Carl Cameron immediately tried to spin Paul's success in the poll when it became apparent he was winning with 30% of the vote shortly after 11PM. Cameron roared that Paul had been "slapped down" by Giuliani in the debate and that his success was merely because his office was unfairly flood voting - ignoring the fact that McCain had openly told his supporters to spam the polls on his own website.

Around thirty minutes before the poll closed, Ron Paul had a commanding lead over Mitt Romney, yet Romney was the supposed winner with 29% to Paul's 25% - this is very suspicious as polls don't usually have these kind of giant swings.

An MSNBC poll again shows Ron Paul trouncing the other candidates, beating his nearest contenders hands down in every category.



ABC News' poll has Ron Paul at 18,500+ votes, with his nearest rivals Romney and Giuliani barely making it into the 200's. This is an emphatic win for the Texas Congressman.



Despite the fact that this whole event was a giant orchestrated smear job on behalf of Fox News to eliminate Ron Paul from the race, his message of liberty and real conservatism still resonates with the American people and no amount of vitriol on behalf of Neo-Con Rupert Murdoch and his underlings is going to change that fact.

WTC7 Collapse to be Discussed by Experts on The View

This was posted on Rosie's Blog tonight:http://www.rosie.com/blog/sections/ask-ro/

Posted by ro on May 14th at 10:39pm in ask roEvie writes:

Dear Ro, I would love to see a show with experts on both sides to discuss WTC7.Silly to always talk about it but never realy pursue the truth once and for all, don’t you think? Please?

the show has been booked

Let's hope she got someone good on there for 9/11 Truth. Doesn't matter who is on the other side.

Faculty fakes gunman attack on crying 6th graders

RAW STORY Click this link to watch video.

Published: Monday May 14, 2007

A teacher and assistant principal at a Tennessee elementary school staged a fake gun attack on frightened students during a class trip, sparking outrage among parents, according to a report from CNN's Newsroom.

According to school board member Lon Nuell, the prank was poorly timed. "Ghost stories are standard, and you scare the kids out of their wits," said Nuell. "But this was very unfortunate timing, if the timing would ever be good for this sort of thing, this was not it," referring to the Virginia Tech shootings that killed 33 students and professors in April.

According to one student who participated in the trip, Dalton Brown, the assistant principal instructed the students to get under desks and said that they had a "code red" – reserved for when an individual is in possession of a gun, knife, or bomb. The school later issued a press release classifying the events as a "typical campfire prank." According to Brown's mother, the prank crossed the line.

"It's just appalling that they would classify this as such a thing, because there's nothing typical about what they did to our children," said Brown. "The kids were underneath tables crying and praying to God and begging for their lives, thinking that they were gonna die and that they were never going to see their families again ."

Let's just keep everyone under the umbrella of fear, including kids.

Rosie Speaks on the View again about 9/11

Elizabeth: "I think steel weakens at 270 degrees" Uhh wait...hold on...my stove just collapsed. Grow a brain you nit.

Some of the 9/11 Whistle-Blowers

Unbelievable: College Students Don't Know What Year 9/11 Happened

Mark Dice and friends visit San Diego State University's job fair and find out that some students have forgot what year 9/11 happened.

Corporate Media Censor Ron Paul's Debate Success

Establishment press ignore massive popular approval for Texas Congressman in every poll, ABC only adds Paul to poll list after furious complaints.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, May 7, 2007

Ron Paul won the debate hands down - all the polls show it - but the establishment media are loathe to report it, because if a tree falls in the forest and the corporate press choose not to report on it then it doesn't make a sound.

After several days of voting, the online MSNBC poll has Ron Paul leading in every single positive category, proving that the vast majority think he won the debate. In an ABC News poll, well over 7,000 voted for the Congressman with Giuliani and Romney receiving a paltry 100 votes each. In a CSPAN poll, 69% voted for Ron Paul, with his nearest contender garnering just 9% of the vote.

Many would attribute this to be a reflection of focused online activism rather than overall national opinion, but the fact is that Paul was way ahead of the other candidates in the hours after the debate ended and before the polls had been widely publicized by websites supportive of the Texas Congressman.

This tells us that the American people are crying out for a real conservative and Ron Paul would be a serious contender for the White House if the media afforded him equal coverage with the likes of Romney, McCain and Giuliani.

However, as Alex Wallenwein points out in his OpEdNews.com article, the establishment media completely ignored public sentiment and handed the victory to either McCain or Romney, barely even mentioning Ron Paul's sterling performance and popular approval.



"Unsurprisingly, not a single report of the actual political news story of the decade, namely, that a virtually unknown “dark horse” beats even the media favorite Romney handily - and utterly crushes the rest of the field," writes Wallenwein.

The headlines seen from a Google News search using the keyword “debate”, at the time of this writing show only this:
“John McCain Wins First GOP Debate” (Fox News)
“Who Won the First GOP Presidential Debate? (Answer provided in article: “Mitt Romney” - National Review Online)
"Republican Presidential Debate Gives No Clue on GOP Leader in Race” (Axcess News)
Apparently the Axcess News editors don't have a clue - unlike actual debate viewers.
A news search for the keywords “won debate” reveals this:
“Noonan, Pundits: Romney Won Debate” (NewsMax)
"Giuliani Wary of Repeal of Roe” (Washington Times)

Readers tell us that ABC didn't even include Ron Paul on their original list and his name was only added to the poll after furious calls to ABC's head office. This website also claims that comments on ABC's message boards expressing outrage at the fact that Paul had been censored were soon deleted.

Even the usually much vaunted Keith Olbermann and his MSNBC co-host Chris Matthews ignored Ron Paul's clear anti-war stance in claiming that none of the Republican candidates opposed the occupation of Iraq.

As if we needed a reminder, the aftermath of the GOP debate has taught us that the path to the Oval office is off-limits to any candidate who is not bought and paid for by special interests and the corporate media. Barely a handful of pre-approved identikit lackeys are selected and lavished with dominant media coverage while anyone who stands for real issues or offers a viable alternative is shunned and censored.

Ron Paul's message of getting government out of our personal lives, destroying the IRS and returning to a founding father foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements is clearly evergreen and craved for by a huge chunk of informed, engaged and active American citizens.

Trust in mainstream media has rapidly eroded for the best part of a decade and their credibility is shot. We need to continue to use the Internet to create synergy with the burning desire of the people to restore constitutional values and ensure that the corporate press can censor Ron Paul no more, save they expose the fact that they are complicit in completely undermining the democratic process in America.

Open Complicity: Anatomy of the 9/11 Cover-Up

An interesting take on 9/11. Raises some more questions.

9/11 The Myth and the Reality: Dr. David Ray Griffin

Two weeks from now DRG will be in Seattle. Don't miss this opportunity.

L.A.P.D. Attack Demonstrators

The F-Bomb is dropped here and there in the second video just to warn ya. Ladee da.






Police state here we come. Courtesy of the NWO. Oh boy am I looking forward to getting shot with a rubber bullet in New York this year.

Loose Change: Final Cut - Teaser

Sheriff Allows Illegal Trespass

Yes! More people standing up for their rights!

I have a beef with Barnes & Noble.

I went into my local B&N the other day to get myself a copy of David Ray Griffin’s new book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking.

Well, they didn’t have it in stock so I decided to wait a couple of days and try again. So I go in last night and low and behold…no copies on the shelf. I went up to the help counter to see if they could…well…help me out.

I was told that they had some in the warehouse but none in the store. So I said to go ahead and order me one into the store. To my surprise, I was told no. “We can have it shipped to your house” (which I would have to cover the S&H fees). After questioning her for a bit, I was brought to the conclusion that they did not want this book sitting on their shelves for all to see. Not unlike all the Popular Mechanics 9/11 Myths books that they so proudly displayed.

Naturally my first response was, “what the @#$%^&!”. Inside my head of course. It is still a bookstore for god sake.

It being late night and all during my visit, I figured it would be best to try to contact a manager during the day time to have the best results, instead of relying on a message to be passed on from one day to the next.

So my task now is to find out the reason for the omission of knowledge in my local Barnes & Noble. Why are they not stocking this on the shelves? Why won’t they order this book into the store? Why the support for the official conspiracy and not alternate conspiracy?

Do me and all of us a favor. Check out your local B&N and see if they are trying to pull the same stunt in your town. And if you don’t have a B&N, then whatever your major bookstore is will do just fine. Write a letter or speak with the manager of the store and find out why this is being done.

I plan to.

The Amero and the North American Union

I am just learning about the Amero myself, so if anyone has any news on it, please send it to me. And Apex, I would love your help on this. Thanks.

Is Big Brother in your car?

By Michelle Esteban
Watch the story

When you hear about "black boxes" you probably picture airplanes that have been in horrible accidents.

The black box is the first thing investigators look for.

The boxes record cockpit communications and airplane information, and can often tell investigators what lead to the disaster.

But few people know that black boxes aren't just in airplanes. They're in cars too. And chances are good there's one in your car, but you can't lift the hood to see it.

But if you get in an accident the information could be used against you.

There are hundreds of vehicle collisions every day. Sometimes the cause is obvious, and other times its not. Drivers often get into a blame game and the accident investigators are left to sort out who is at fault.

But your car's black box can help them do just that.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, more than half of all new cars now carry a so-called black box. The device records how a car was being driven just seconds before impact. The black box, which is really silver, is buried in the car's underbelly and incorporated into the airbag system.

Entire Article: Click Here

Son Of JFK Conspirator Drops New Bombshell Revelations

Costner was set to make documentary on Hunt's confession, before Miami mafia stepped in, E. Howard believed government had sabotaged his wife's plane.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, May 3, 2007

As the explosive revelation of E. Howard Hunt's deathbed confession, in which the former CIA agent and Watergate conspirator admits that he was part of a CIA conspiracy to assassinate JFK, continues to rage across the Internet, the establishment media remains almost mute on what is undoubtedly one of the biggest stories of the decade.

Saint John Hunt, E. Howard Hunt's oldest son, joined Alex Jones yesterday to drop new bombshells about his father's story.
Click here to listen.

Entire Article: Click Here

RFK Immediately Thought Brother's Assassination Was Conspiracy

David Talbot
Salon
Thursday May 03, 2007

One of the most intriguing mysteries about the assassination of John F. Kennedy, that darkest of American labyrinths, is why his brother Robert F. Kennedy apparently did nothing to investigate the crime. Bobby Kennedy was, after all, not just the attorney general of the United States at the time of the assassination -- he was his brother's devoted partner, the man who took on the administration's most grueling assignments, from civil rights to organized crime to Cuba, the hottest Cold War flashpoint of its day. But after the burst of gunfire in downtown Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963, ended this unique partnership, Bobby Kennedy seemed lost in a fog of grief, refusing to discuss the assassination with the Warren Commission, and telling friends he had no heart for an aggressive investigation. "What difference does it make?" he would say. "It won't bring him back."

Entire Article: Click Here